Tag: Comedy

Masters of The Universe (2026)

Posted on by fenrisfil

He has the power, to pick up a flower, to jump off a tower, and Die… He Man! At least that’s how I remember the song going. Anyway, there is a new He-Man movie out. Well, I say He-Man, technically it is “Masters of the Universe” (Much like the previous 1987 movie). Possibly a marketing mistake, since most people remember the franchise simply as “He-Man”. The franchise hasn’t been totally dormant since the 1980’s, with a variety of cartoon reboots and spin offs along with comics and of course toys. However, this is the first attempt at live action since Dolph Lundgren dclared “I have the power!”.

Director Travis Knight previously had mild franchise success with ” Bumblebee”, one of the better Transformer movies but only a mild success. Adam and Aaron Nee are the main writers, they previously wrote and directed “The Lost City”, an amusing adventure comedy with Sandra Bullock. Fabian Wagner provides cinematography and Daniel Pemberton provides an awesome soundtrack (With a hand from Brian May on electric guitar). The franchise still has fans among those that grew up with it and others that just enjoyed the memes. But is that enough to make it a success? Well, apparently not. The movie has flopped in theatres, but is it actually bad?

By The Power of Grayskull

The movie starts with an explaination of how Prince Adam of Eternia ended up on Earth. Adam was a scawny eight year old at the time and felt like he was a disapointment to his warrior king father Randor. When Skelletor attacked he fled with his mother and King Randor to Castle Greyskull, to protect the sword from falling into evil hands. As Randor bravely stood off with Skeletor, Adam was charged by the Sorceress of Grayskull to protect the sword. And so she sent him to Earth. On Earth however the child was separated from the sword and has spent two decades searching for it. Now fully adapted to Earth culture, he finally finds the sword, but finding it reveals his location and both heroes and villains rush to meet him.

Re-united with his childhood friend Teela, he returns to Eternia to find a planet dominated by Skeletors cruelty, with the heroes of eternia mounting what resistance they can. When Skeletors attacks again he finally unlocks the power of Greyskull to become He-Man. Eternia finally has it’s champion, but the odds are still against them. Skeletor has Adam’s family in captivity and while Adam now has the power of a hero, he still has the heart of that scrawny eight year old and the brain of a human that works in HR services. Can he really be the hero Eternia needs?

I Have The Power

This is a movie that appears to be made with clear priorities. The absolute top priority here is to be fun. That’s not a bad thing for a summer blockbuster, but it’s not all positive. The movie does not take itself seriously and on occasion it is to the movies detriment. Adam/He-Man is most often the butt of the jokes and after a while it feels a bit too much. Goofy male heroes that everyone else mocks are a bit of a cliché in the modern day. While it felt like a journey for Adam this was okay, but there’s a joke at the very end where the movie goes all in on the memes of secret identities in a way that just makes Adam look… Well, mentally challenged. That said, a lot of the time this priority does pay off. There are a lot of jokes that do land and the movie is actually fun.

The second priority is to be true to the 80’s cartoon. The character design look really like the cartoon/toy versions. Even with Idris Elba being a race swapped Man at Arms, between his armour and moustache it still feels like the character. The world of Eternia too looks really like the fantasy world of the cartoon. Everything looks right. It doesn’t end there though. The cartoon always had a pretty thick layer of moral messaging, and even as an eight year old I cringed at the post story talks in the show. So when the film gets into a bit of cringe moralizing, it feels more like a reference than serious preaching. Especially since the movie spends more time mocking Adam for his talk-things-through attitude, than supporting it. Fun was the top priority after all.

HEYYEYAAEYAAAEYAEYAA

The third priority here is to reference as many memes and in-jokes as possible. This makes the movie very self aware and feeds further into why the moralizing feels more like a reference than modern social preaching. That final joke, I found so grating is a part of these. It was a bit like having the “Batman runs away and you aren’t supposed to notice” meme in an actual Batman film. Mostly though this is more subtle. For example they play the Four Non-Blondes song “What’s up” at one point, a reference to the “Heyyey” He-Man meme video (A 20 year old meme at this point). They don’t however re-enact that video (In the movie), they just have the song play and at a point where it works regardless of the meme. There are also a lot of “Fisto” jokes. I think that was always somewhat expected. It’s just innuendo though, so it’s still kid friendly.

Fourth priority is a little unexpected and that is to try and emulte 1980’s Flash Gordon movie. Clearly this was roughly what they were aiming for in the style and they went so far as to bag Brian May to play guitar on the soundtrack. This part works really well because the soundtrack for this movie is an absolute banger and very much feels like an 80’s Queen influenced soundtrack. We do even get one Queen track (From a totally different 80’s movie, Highlander) in the mix too. Outside of the music there is a rocket cycle (Briefly) and just a general vibe that this was what they were going for. However the balance is off for Flash Gordon. The humour impacts versimilitude a bit too much. Flash was fun, but it always felt like it was taking itself somewhat seriously along the way. He-Man is far to self referential and comedic to hit that sweet spot.

The Plot’s In Hear Somewhere

Below those priorities are “Actually have a plot”. So if strong stories are your thing, this may not be for you. It’s not that it doesn’t have one, it’s just paper thin and full of contrivences. The movie doesn’t waste too much time on Earth, but between the Earth stuff and the intro backstory, there is little time to really explore Eternia after. A lot of the world and it’s characters don’t feel fleshed out. Evil Lynn for instance is very much in the background (Alison Brie is largely wasted). I can’t help but feel the entire Earth detour was unneccisary. Really this feeds into most of my issues with the movie. Do we need an audience perspective character for a 45 year old fantasy franchise? Without Earth, Adam wouldn’t be the goofy comic relief the whole time. On top of that, the 80’s cartoon moralizing wouldn’t have felt “Woke” had it not been filtered through a literal HR office.

These are what most of the negative reviews focused on too. But really, once you get past the Earth influence, everything else in the movie is actually very well done. Despite the race swap, Idris Elba makes a great Man-at-Arms. Teela feels like Teela from the cartoon series (Though the writers often didn’t know what to do with her). Trapjaw looks great and is elevated to pretty much the secondary antagonist (Over Evil Lynn), a surprising move that really paid off. But the stand out, shockingly is Jared Leto as Skeletor. He brings out the full ham for the role, but that is basically what Skeletor always was (At least in the 80’s cartoon). Instead of trying to give him some motivation where he sees himself as the good guy (As is the current trend), they just accept, he has a skull for a face, he is evil and he LOVES it.

Conclusion

Ultimately this is a solid, fun popcorn movie. It has flaws and if you focus too hard on the flaws you won’t enjoy it. But for the most part it is hard not to have a good time with this movie. He-Man is in truth a nearly impossible franchise to realize as a movie. The children that grew up with it at it’s peak are now around 50. The series had many elements hard to take seriously, starting with something as simple as the character names. So do you make a kids movie or do you take something that no adult could really take seriously and do it as a serious adult fantasy? The self aware comedy approach is probably the safest one. Safe doesn’t always pay off though and this movie is failing badly at the box office. But does it deserve that? In my view – No.

The movie is not trying to re-invent the wheel. It’s just trying to entertain while being true enough to the franchise that Gen X feel a bit of their childhood is on screen. It mostly got it right. The modern day clichés such as the male hero being the butt of all the jokes, while female character are overly dry and serious is hard to escape these days, but they don’t let it ruin the movie. The visuals, the soundtrack and the relatively frequent action helps to keep you interested as the movie goes on and many of the jokes land well. At times the movie feels like they truly nailed it. Other times, not so much. But it is an overall positive. This is a 6.5/10. Flawed in places, but fun enough to be worth watching anyway.

Rating: 6.5 out of 10.

The Naked Gun (2025)

Posted on by fenrisfil

Hollywood rarely does original these days and comedy reboots are becoming increasingly common. So it was only a matter of time before someone tried to reboot “The Naked Gun” (1988). I hear you saying “Reboot the naked Gun? Surely you can’t be serious?” and to which I say “That gag doesn’t work in text form very well”. Anyway, filling the shoes of Leslie Neilson in the movie franchise that made him a household name is not an easy task. Initially I wasn’t even going to watch this. I just couldn’t see anyone making a reboot movie that was even a touch on the original. On top of this, the 2020’s is not a decade that has been very kind to comedy. My hopes were rock bottom. Then I saw the trailer and it was actually funny. I decided it was worth a shot.

So stepping into those shoes is veteran Actor Liam Neeson. Not because he has the same initials, but because he’s a serious actor that has shown he can do comedy with a relatively straight face. The casting makes sense. Neeson though is very hit and miss with his movies. He’s not someone that can make an underwhelming script shine. Every now and then though he drops a gem. He is joined by Pamela Anderson, continuing her comeback story. Another casting choice that makes sense for a reboot. This is not a remake though, nor is it a true sequel. It’s a reboot that is set in the same universe as the original. Neeson is playing Frank Drebin’s son (Frank Drebin jr). Given his age, this only really makes sense if he was from a past relation before the original film. Not that these things matter in a comedy like this.

The New Version

The movie is directed by former Saturday Night Live writer Akiva Schaffer. I’m not familiar with his work but he’s had some success. Seth MacFarlane is the lead producer and was responsible for taking the Naked Gun series from David Zucker who had been making his own pitch for a continuation. Zucker’s version would have featured a younger son who wouldn’t be a cop, but would inadvertently get caught up in a spy story. MacFarlane was more after a straight reboot as he’s been a very vocal fan of Zucker’s comedy style for many years. Family Guy has endless “Airplane!” references. MacFarlane is not scripting this however. Instead Schaffer is joined by Dan Gregor and Doug Mand.

Our story opens with the bank raid from the trailer. Drebin heroically foils the robber but is unaware that the real target was a safety deposit box. It’s contents, an electron device labeled “P.L.O.T. Device” has already been removed from the bank before Drebin’s heroics. His next case sees him investigating the death of a Software Engineer and introduces him to the engineers sister Beth (Anderson). The two cases end up related and Frank finds himself trying to stop a megalomaniac from causing a type of Armageddon. Through all this, Frank is trying to find his own place in the world and make his deceased father proud.

But Is It Funny?

So, is this movie funny and how does it compare to the original? First, yes the movie is funny. It’s not a classic. Many of the jokes don’t land. A couple are dragged out beyond their welcome and become boring. Many of the better jokes were spoiled by the trailers. But there are some jokes that land and for a modern comedy it has a pretty solid laugh per minute ratio. However, The Naked Gun movies are some of the funniest ever made. No so much the third, though it is fine. But the first two have an insane laughs per minute ratio, probably only beaten by the comedy masterpiece that is “Airplane!” (1980). After viewing this relaunch I went home and watched the original. Seven minutes in I realized I’d already laughed more than I did for the entire of the 2025 movie. Not good.

The funniest scene in the movie is partially spoiled by the trailer and appears to be a knock off of an Austin Powers joke. That didn’t stop me laughing at it. There is also a a great scene in a nightclub that was obviously inspired by “Airplane!” and I’m okay with that little nod. There’s a few good car jokes thrown in too and a recurring coffee gag. All of which had me laugh. That may seem like a lot of praise but if I made a list like this for the original Naked Gun It’d take me a year to complete. The originally had some lesser jokes, but none fell flat. There is a lot here that had me roll my eyes. The worst joke here is an overly drawn out gag that I can only described as a misplaced Family Guy cutaway. I was bored.

Liam and Pamela

But what about the actors? Liam Neeson is actually quite good at comedy and he was a good choice to attempt to fill Leslie Neilson’s boots. The problem is, those shoes cannot be filled. It’s like trying to replace Peter Sellers in “The Pink Panther” franchise. It is doomed to fail. They’ve actually failed twice already with replacing Sellers and now Eddie Murphy is going to try (And no doubt fail). If anything replacing Neilson is an even more impossible task. The man had a unique gift of being able to deliver virtually any form of comedy as if he is in the most serious of dramatic movies. Neeson meanwhile overplays it. Where Leslie’s comedy felt almost accidental, Liam’s feels like an intentional parody. On the other hand Pamela Anderson is every bit as good as Priscilla Presley and I really hope she does more comedy. She nailed it.

The rest of the cast is pretty much inconsequential. It’s not the actors fault, they just aren’t given anything to work with. The new Nordberg doesn’t even have a part beyond the OJ Simpson joke that was in all the trailers. The new Ed is just goofy and sort of hangs around with little to do but drink coffee. The villain, played by Danny Huston about as generic villain as you can get. He’s certainly no Ricardo Montalban (His counterpart from the original). I couldn’t help but notice that the entire villainous plot is ripped off of “Kingsman”. It wouldn’t have been so bad had they actually done a parody of the infamous church scene. Sadly original is the last thing anyone would describe this film as.

Conclusion

Criticism aside though, did I enjoy the film? Mildly. I think ultimately this was a bad idea. Some actors can’t be replaced, Leslie Neilson is one. There’s also only so many jokes you can make about an old maverick ass kicking cop. David Zucker pitched a very different Naked Gun sequel that involved taking the film in a different direction. I really wish we’d gotten that film instead. But it is what it is. The good news is that a lot of the comedy here is the kind of thing that many thought you could no longer get away with. While that is good, if we are going to get a resurgence in the genre, it needs to also find some originality. I’m not sure that will happen. Instead we’ll get another “Scary Movie” film, “Space Balls 2”, and a third attempt at a “Pink Panther” reboot.

As for this movie. It is worth watching. It is funny. But it’s no classic. Frankly, this is not worth a trip to the cinema. But catch it when it is on streaming for a spot of nostalgia and a few good laughs. If you find you enjoy it, stay for the credits as there are jokes in them and a post credit scene. Best I can give this is a 6/10. Mild recommendation.

Rating: 6 out of 10.

Saturday Night (2024)

Posted on by fenrisfil

This is a Docudrama retelling of the hours leading up to the debut of the comedy series Saturday Night Live. This is a show due to hit it’s 50th anniversary next year and has become an established path for comedians to break into the movie industry. Less so in recent years, where frankly it’s reputation has hit rock bottom. It’s worth noting SNL was meant to be a counter culture show, much like “The Simpsons”. But success and longevity tends to turn such shows into the very thing they were meant to culture in the first place. But the list of stars made on that stage in it’s first three decades is long and impressive: John Belushi, Chevy Chase, Bill Murray, Dan Akroyd, Eddie Murphy, Mike Myers, Chris Rock, Adam Sandler, Will Ferrell and Tina Fey to name but ten.

In the UK, we never really got to see the show. It’s only thanks to the internet that I’ve been able to watch some of the most famous sketches retrospectively. I never have watched a full show though. This isn’t unusual for people outside the US, but we all know the movies that those listed above went on to star in. Especially true for those first few. The Blues Brothers, Beverly Hill’s Cop and Ghostbusters are legendary movies. Everyone knows them. So I was definitely curious about this movie. However, I’m not going to have the same affection for a show I never actually watched. The movie is directed by Jason Reitman and stars Gabriel LaBelle as Lorne Michaels, the mind behind the show. He’s joined by a vast ensemble cast, reflecting the real life characters that made the show happen.

Everybody Who is Anybody

Since most of the characters in this story are very well known celebrities the obvious question is how well do the actors nail them? Broadly speaking, I would say very well, at least the characters I actually know (About 75%). Nicholas Braun did double duty playing both Jim Henson and Andy Kaufman. Neither had a lot of screen time, but he nailed both. He could maybe even give Jim Carey a run for his money on Kaufman. Matthew Rhys briefly played George Carlin and felt pretty accurate. The big ones though were Cory Michael Smith as Chevy Chase, Dylan O’Brien as Dan Akroyd and Matt Wood as John Belushi. These were all spot on. Belushi seemed wild and Chase and Akroyd delivered lines exactly like they would in real life. From what I know of their personalities, I feel they nailed that too.

This is a mostly factual account of events. They have squeezed several events that may have happened but not in the run up to the first night into the story. A few events such as Milton Berle getting his dick out didn’t happen at Saturday Night Live. However, he was well known for showing off his meat, so it’s not a total fabrication. That said, this is a frantic movie packed with well known actors, famous characters and crazy events and frankly a lot of it could have been trimmed. Most notably the Berle stuff (Even with J.K Simmons in the role). Possibly a reason why it is there is because he’s considered the worst host the show ever had, so maybe it makes sense to actual fans of the show. The density of the cast also sometimes means it’s not always clear who is who. Indeed I probably missed a few cameos along the way.

Curtains Up

The most important question is of course, is it actually fun. Yes, for sure. It’s not really a film I can see having much replay value though. That’s probably due to the fast pace. The character moments didn’t really land for me and the stakes were a little redundant since I think most people figured the show would make it to air (You know, given the near 50 year run it’s had). So it’s not especially emotional or edge of the seat, but it is fascinating and amusing. I think most people will enjoy it regardless of if you know Saturday Night Live or not. I suspect if you do though, you will get more out of it. Conversely if you are too young to really care about 80’s and 90’s comedy films or know the comedians involved, this may not be for you. For me it just about hit 6.5/10 and largely on the strength of how convincing the impersonations were.

Rating: 6.5 out of 10.

Deadpool and Wolverine (2024)

Posted on by fenrisfil

It’s been a while since I’ve reviewed a superhero movie. The truth is most of them aren’t that interesting to me these days. However, this team up is too appealing to resist. If the box office is any indication, I’m not alone in feeling that. This is a truly unique situation for a movie. It’s not just along overdue team up (We don’t talk about “X-Men Origins:Wolverine”). It’s also the first time Deadpool, regular breaker of the fourth wall has been able to directly reference the MCU. Last but not least it is more than nostalgia it is the farewell to the Fox X-Men universe. Truly, the end of an era. Effectively this is the “End Game” of the the Fox Superhero franchises.

Spoiler Free

This installment of the Deadpool franchise is directed by “Free Guy” (2021) director Shawn Levy. Writing credits go to Levy, Reynolds, Rhett Reese, Paul Warnick and Zeb Wells. Ryan Reynolds obviously returns as Deadpool and is joined by Hugh Jackman as Wolverine. Emma Corrin and Matthew MacFayden play the movies main antagonists (“Cassandra Nova” and Mr. Paradox” respectively). The rest of the cast will remain unnamed by me since that is basically spoilers (Don’t look at imdb btw, they are listed). Before I give you the basics, it’s important to know this is a spoiler free review. However, I will reference the material in the trailer, so if you have been avoiding even watching that you may want to skip to the conlusion.

I will keep the plot summary minimal. Effectively Deadpools universe is going to collapse due to the death of it’s “Anchor”. Being the universe of the Fox X-Men it’s no surprise that the anchor is none other than Wolverine. Don’t think to hard about an entire universe revolving around one single person from Earth, it is what it is! Deadpool is recruited by the Time Variance Authority and offered a new life in a certain other universe (Yes, the MCU). However, he would prefer to try and fix his own world. To do that he needs to find a new Wolverine. From here on things get complicated and spoiler filled, so that is all you are getting from me on the plot!

The Fox Multiverse

The movie features a lot of cameos, some of which actually turn into substantial supporting characters (At least for the middle act). If you have seen the trailer you know of two of these cameos, X-23 (From “Logan”) and Sabretooth. X23 is one of the characters with a more substantial role and it’s good to see the character grown up. Alongside her though there are three more characters that get a bit of a story arc and one more big (If short) cameo. On the villain side there are several cameos but most are blink-and-you’ll-miss-it affairs. The selection for all of these are well balanced and will give some surprises while providing at least one long overdue return of a fan favourite.

In some ways the use of the multiverse for these characters is similar to how it was used in Spider-Man: No Way home. It actually provides somewhat of a redemption arc for characters and actors that were not given the best of send offs or really even given a chance. But it’s important to note, these characters are mostly limited to the middle act. The first and final act still make use of the multiverse but in very different ways. But while this is all fun and creative the film never loses sight of what is important: Deadpool and Wolverine. This is their journey. Of course this is a Deadpool film first and foremost and that means Deadpool style humour and fourth wall breaking, but Wolverine fits into that world almost perfectly.

The Good, The Bad and The Other Stuff

So what about the weaknesses? Well, the plot never really feels that important. Perhaps because it is approached in a such a meta way or because the multiverse removes all stakes anyway. The movies two antagonists are okay and Emma Corrin does a great job as Cassandra Nova but their motivations for the entire film effectively feel like they just need to make the plot happen. It’s like they didn’t want a plot to get too in the way of the comedy. That’s fine but it is still the movies weakness. The TVA (As revealed in the trailer) are basically just here to initiate events and in many ways feel like an unwelcome interloper into a movie that is very much about the Fox Marvel films. It’s not a major issue though as they don’t dwell too heavily on any of the MCU elements.

The best thing about the movie is that it is fun! Of course it’s a Deadpool movie and you know what to expect. Outrageous comedy, meta comedy and outrageous meta comedy. The movie dives head first into the last of those right at the start. They found a remarkable way to simultaneously respect and disrespect the ending “Logan” (2017). This, they managed in a way that I think most people will be okay with it. Many watching will have no idea who the cameos are and won’t get a lot of the references. The humour though, should all still land. That is important because technically to get the most out of this movie you need to have seen every Fox and Disney Marvel movie, but if you haven’t seen a single one of them you should still have fun.

Conclusion

So what does the future hold now for Deadpool, Wolverine and the MCU? Impossible to tell. This movie has a lot in common with Spider-Man: No Way Home. That movie firmly remained an outlier for the MCU. The wrong lessons were learned and Marvel ultimately dived blindly into the multiverse to the point where everything seemed unimportant. Outside of that the MCU stuck to the plan that Kevin Feige had laid out before the Fox acquisition with extreme tunnel vision. This movie should show them that those Fox characters are still well loved. Ignoring them is leaving money on the table. That said, they need to have their own take on these characters. I don’t envy anyone stepping into High Jackman’s shoes.

The MCU is a juggernaut of a franchise and course correction takes a long time. We will have to see if they can manage it while there is still an audience. Whatever fate has in store for the MCU, this movie is a success in every way that matters. It is a final emotional farewell to the Fox era of superhero movies, a long overdue team up and highly entertaining movie in its own right. Oh and it’s also making bucket loads of money at the box office. This is a success and it’s a big recommendation from me. Is it the perfect movie? No, frankly the plot is paper thin and that limits the rating, but the movie is so much fun I’m still giving it a high one: 7.5/10.

Rating: 7.5 out of 10.

Bad CGI Gator (2023)

Posted on by fenrisfil

Yes, you read the title correctly. It’s time to dive into the world of modern B-Movie horror with this ridiculous horror comedy from Full Moon Features. If you know the name, you will know this is Charles Band’s company, so this is a studio (In one form or other) that have been making low budget horror (and some sci-fi) since the 70’s. They know how to get the most out of the budget and how to make movies quickly. That doesn’t make this movie sound any less silly of course! This feature is just under an hour in length and is directed by Danny Draven (Also taking composer duties) and penned by Zalman Band (Charlies son).

There is some controversy with this film. The makers of “Bad CGI Sharks”. Obviously they feel their idea was ripped off. It’s worth considering though gimmick shark movies aren’t exactly original either, so maybe it’s fair game maybe not. You can decide that one for yourself. There’s certainly no doubting they stole the “Bad CGI” idea, the only question is, does that matter? Personally I’m not sure, but I do know at this budget level there is a lot of band wagon jumping in general. Anyway, let’s get back to the Gator and see if it has any teeth!

A Reptile Dysfunction.

The synopsis for this one is short. It’s a 1 hour horror comedy B-movie, what did you expect? A group of friends (Well four friends, one sister and a guy dragged along apparently to set him up with the sister), head to a lakeside cabin for spring break. The nearby lake has an alligator living it, though the friends aren’t aware of this. One of the girls, a tik-tok “Influenced” wants to throw the groups college laptops into the lake for a video (Because “The college will just replace them”). After the stunt they return to their cabin, however the laptops electrocute the lakes alligator transforming it into…. Uh, BAD CGI GATOR! Yes, that happened.

It’s worth reminding you, this is meant to be a comedy, so don’t expect anything to make sense. Anyway, the now CGI Gator starts attacking the friends picking them off one at a time until only the sister “Hope” (Played by Madie Lane) and the non-friend “Sam” (Michael Bonini) remain. Sam and Hope are also quickly developing feelings for each other after Sam romantically stalked her instagram account. Between them they must find a way to escape from this gator, which by the way can also fly and after consuming a bluetooth speaker, grow in size because that’s how it works now.

Bad CGI.

Okay, so this is a ridiculous plot. But for a horror comedy it isn’t really a problem as long as the film is funny and fortunately this is. I laughed out loud several times and in a movie that is less than an hour in length that is a win. Honestly the film probably could do with being a little longer, especially as the ending is a little on the quick side. That said, something like this being too short is probably better than being too long. The effects are what you’d expect and despite the severed limbs I wouldn’t really describe it as “Gore”. Indeed the severed limbs are mostly used for comic effect and quite effectively. There’s also some nice ironic elements with the corpses, which I always approve of in horror films.

The bad CGI gator is of course bad CGI, which you would expect. One issue with this though is the quality of CGI is actually no worse than I’d expect in a low budget horror anyway and case in point, even before the alligator is transformed it is bad CGI. My criticism here is they probably could have made the transformed version a bit worse! It would have been a nice touch to have had it “clipping” into the scenery and stuff on occasion too. For example they could have had it unable to pursue people at some point because it’s tail has clipped into the ground and so it is stuck. Missed opportunity.

Spring Break.

The characters and acting is around about what you’d expect for a low budget B, but there are definitely three tiers to it. Effectively you have three couples (Though the lead pair aren’t a couple until the end) and each couple is about on par for acting talent. One pairing is notably bad, especially the girl’s dialogue delivery, but the movie helps us out here by making them the gators first victim. The next tier are actually in some ways the most fun characters in the film. Both characters are shallow college kid stereotypes, but the actors go all in on the roles and that really helps the comedy. When we are introduced to them I rolled my eyes, but since they provide most of the comedy it was almost a shame to see them killed off.

The final pair is our two leads, Sam and Hope. As actors Bonini and Lane are better than you would expect at this budget level and with the right breaks could probably go a lot further in their careers. It’s always worth remembering just how many big Hollywood stars started out in low budget horrors (Maybe not always this low, but sometimes). Demi Moore for example was in another Charlie Band produced movie “Parasite” from 1982. So they are worth keeping an eye on. Not that this was an Oscar level performance or anything, just better than I expected.

Conclusion.

So overall, this is actually a lot better than most people would expect a movie called “Bad CGI Gator” to be. The plot barely exists, there is bad acting and bad effects, but the movie is fun, funny and in it’s own B-Movie way, clever. Some of the acting is better than you’d expect at this level and some of the characters you’d expect to hate turn out to be the most entertaining. Overall, while it’s not going to get a high rating, when I put this on I figured I’d be lucky to get a 4/10 but instead it’s a high 5/10. Not the best, but higher than I’ve rated some Hollywood horror movies. If you love your B’s, you’ll get a kick out of it.

Rating: 5 out of 10.

Blood Diner (1987)

Posted on by fenrisfil

Well that’s it, the final review of my 2023 October Challenge. This is the low budget horror comedy “Blood Diner” from 1987. The movie was the third of four movies directed by Jackie Kong in a short career likely only made possible by the VHS boom of the 80’s. The movie was written by Michael Sonye, who has had a reasonable career as an actor but only has writing credits for six movies. This is the highest rated on IMDb at 5.3/10. His lowest is rated at 2.8 out of ten. This is one of those movies where much of the cast have only appeared in this one film and many of the ones that have been in other things use shots from this movie as their bio picture on IMDb (Or have no picture). This gives you hint of what to expect!

Bon Appétit.

The plot of the movie revolves around a pair of cannibals and their “Vegetarian” diner. Two brothers and their dead uncle (Now a brain in a jar) are planning to perform an ancient ceremony to resurrect the ancient Lumerian goddess Sheetar. To do this they have to make a number of preparations that mostly involve killing young women, preparing a cannibalistic stew that will make those that consume it turn into feral zombie like cannibals and prepare the sacrifice of a virgin. On their tail are a pair of tough yet bumbling police officers, investigating a what appears to be a serial killer targeting vegetarians.

Junk Food.

Okay, so I’m just going to say it: This is a bad movie. Whenever I review a fairly average movie I usually say “It’s not terrible but…”, well this one is terrible and there is no real “But” to that. There are some good ideas, but the execution of them is so poor that most viewers likely won’t even give it that much credit. It is poorly acted, poorly scripted, badly paced (Rushing from one joke/murder to the next without giving any of it room to breath), music that seems absent half the time it is needed and overstays it’s welcome when it is not, the gore was so comical that it lost all impact and worst of all, it just wasn’t funny.

Most of the humour falls flat. Most of the jokes are either casual but cartoon like violence or general gross out stuff. There were three scenes that were sort of funny. One was the intro, specifically the radio broadcast about the psycho. Another was where one of the brothers has to keep running someone over before he actually dies and another where a woman having seen her friend being chopped up goes to run away, but then runs back because she forgot her handbag. That was it. The rival chef’s ventriloquist dummy could have been funny in theory, but didn’t really work in practice. It felt out of place and just came across as pointless and dumb.

So Bad It’s Bad.

The acting is especially bad. I’ve watched a lot of low budget B-movies, so I have a pretty good tolerance for bad acting, but this was next level bad. Pretty much all the actors playing the police were dreadful. The worst of the bunch was Sheba Jackson as “LaNette La France” and it’s no surprise to see this is her only credit on IMDB. Max Morris was almost as bad as the Police Chief and joins Sheba in the “This is my only acting credit” department. Fortunately Rick Burks and Carl Crew, who played the two cannibal brothers were just regular bad, though the script they had to work with didn’t do them any favours. Drew Godderis also managed a tolerable performance as the brain in a jar psycho uncle, though he is helped by just being a voice actor.

I get the impression half of the joke here is meant to be that the film is really bad. This kind of thing never really works for me. Things being intentionally bad always fail to reach that “So bad it’s good” category. Most humour works best when played straight, most funny low budget movies work best when the makers treat it seriously, no matter how crazy the ideas they are working on are. Here it seemed they spent too long laughing at their own jokes. Really a lot of this plays like a series of sketches haphazardly thrown together, with most of it adding nothing to the overall story.

Concussion.

Ultimately, this is one big fail. The concept could have worked, but not with this director, writer and most of these actors. Some people may be able to get a kick out of it and I think being drunk and/or high will help. But coming in dry, it’s just plain bad. I give it a few points for trying to be fun and for the half decent concept, but the most generous I can be with this one is a low 3.5/10. On a side note, I like the trailer. It’s better than the movie. That’s all. Happy Halloween and whatever your viewing tonight (If anything), I hope it’s better that this!

Rating: 3.5 out of 10.

A Bucket Of Blood (1959)

Posted on by fenrisfil

For tonight’s October Challenge Review, I’m checking out the Roger Corman directed black comedy horror “A Bucket of Blood” from 1959. This was a turning point in the legendary producer/directors career. While he had was always a master of B-Movies, this was the first of a strong run of films which including the original “Little Shop of Horrors” and “The Fall of the House of Usher” in 1960, “Pit and the Pendulum” in 1961, “Tale of Terror” in 1962 and “The Raven” and “The Haunted Palace” in 1963. Despite being made in five days for $50k, its often considered one of Corman’s finest works. So let’s see if this is truly a work of art or just a feat of clay….

Walter Paisley Is Born!

A Bucket of Blood was written by Charles B. Griffith who would go on to pen two more of Corman’s cult classics “Little Shop of Horrors” and “Death Race 2000”. The movie stars Dick Miller as the slow, impressionable, busboy and wannabe artist “Walter Paisley”. Supporting cast includes Barboura Morris, Antony Carbone and Julian Burton.

The straight forward plot sees Walter desperately trying to become an artist so he can fit in with the crowd of Beatnik Hipsters at “The Yellow Door Cafe” and win the affections of cafe hostess “Carla” (Morris). His problem is he completely lacks talent and gets easily frustrated. One evening at home he hears his neighbours cat stuck in the wall and in attempting to free the pet Walter accidentally kills it. Feeling creatively inspired and desiring to cover up the accident he covers the cat in clay and presents it as a sculpture to Carla and his boss Leonard (Carbone). The “Sculpture” goes down well with Carla and the crowd at the cafe and encourage him to create more.

After Walter murders a police officer that was trying to arrest him for possession of heroin (Given to him by a fan at the cafe), he turns the corpse into a new “Sculpture”, gaining further accolades from the crowd at the cafe. Encouraged by their praise and afraid of being forgotten, Walter continues to murder people to turn them into even more macabre “Art”. This can’t go on forever of course, especially not with someone as dimwitted as Walter doing it. Leonard has already figured it out, but gaining a big cut of his sales he has so far kept quiet. When Leonard puts on a bit exhibition for Walter, things are bound to come to a head.

What is Art?

So first of all, I loved how well this movie sends up the pretentious and fickle nature of the beatnik art scene. As they say, the more things change, the more they stay the same and I can’t help but feel you could remake this film in the modern day and this side of it would work just as well now as it did then. The bohemian crowd at the cafe where Walter works initially look down their nose at him, much as they do anyone they consider mundane and not creative. But as soon as he presents his work to them, they (mostly) treat him like a superstar. Falling over themselves to hang out with him and offering large amounts for his work. They even greet the unimaginative, purely descriptive titles of his pieces (Such as “Dead Cat”) like the naming itself is a work of genius.

Every character here is a clever parody of the kinds of characters you would find in such a community. Leonard is both repulsed by the art, even before realizing what they really are. Yet he is overcome with greed when bids start coming in for it. After a man offers him $300 for “Dead Cat”, Leonard gives Walter just $50 as his cut and only does this as an excuse for Walter not to work as a bus boy anymore since he understandably creeps him out. Later Leonard remarks “I’m starting for feel responsible for this”.

Go Down You Murderer!

One benefit of the setting is that it provides a Jazz heavy soundtrack, which was actually pretty common in 1959 but I’m yet to find this a negative. A lot of the score mixes in the Jazz elements with standard horror elements and the result is a pretty intense, fast paced soundtrack. Mixed in with that are the diegetic tracks such as the folk track “The Ballad of Tim Evans” (The story of a man condemned for murder) played shortly after the first murder. All told, excellent use of music throughout.

Effects wise… well there aren’t any really outside of the clay statues (Which is more prop than effect) and the ending especially you can tell they didn’t have the time or budget to quite do it justice. Fortunately though the ending still works (And actually makes sense given Walter’s incompetence is an important theme of the story). The rest of the film didn’t really need effects. It’s actually very much designed from the ground up to work with the limitations that Corman had in place. This is why he is the master of the B-movies.

The King of the B’s

It’s very easy to dismiss B-movies and those that make them as lesser cinema/film makers. But that doesn’t do justice to just how clever and skillful those that make them have to be to create something good with so little money and in such a short period of time. Not to mention how in tune you have to be with the audiences to actually be successful. Corman has produced a lot of bad movies, usually the ones that take effects, musics and entire scenes from other movies. But even those are far better than they probably had any right to be. Between those though there are actually a lot of good movies and it’s no shock really to find many Marvel fans still consider his unreleased (But leaked) Fantastic Four movie to be the most accurate version of the team to date.

While my favourite Corman movie will probably always be “Battle Beyond The Stars”, this is definitely one of his best. While it’s not scary or even particularly unsettling, the satire on the art community/beatnik community was absolutely nailed and doing it with such a macabre story is in itself quite poetic. This is a strong 6.5/10. Oh and there is a literal bucket of blood in it, so the title isn’t completely random!

Rating: 6.5 out of 10.

Head of the Family (1996)

Posted on by fenrisfil

Tonight for my October Challenge Review, I’m checking out the 1996 Horror Comedy “Head of the Family” from Charles Band. Band is mostly known as a producer and one of the most prolific producer of low budget (Mostly horror) movies in the history of the movies, likely only behind his idol Roger Corman. Every now and then, such as with this movie, he steps behind the camera himself. Well, to be fair he’s taken the directors chair 86 times, which is more than some of the most prolific Hollywood directors. Often the results of these more hands on movies are very good. For example one of my favourite cult classics “Trancers” (1984) was a Band directed movie.

As can often be the case with B-Movie horror, Head of the Family features actors mostly know for appearing in this movie. Indeed many of the actors IMDB bio’s use a photo from this movie for their publicity shot. Unlike some of those movies though (Troll 2 comes to mind), they have been in other films and actually their acting was perfectly reasonable. You don’t make movies for the kind of budgets Charles Band works with by hiring big name Hollywood stars. Anyway, Blake Adams plays the movies lead “Lance” alongside Jacqueline Lovell as “Loretta” while the titular Head is played by J.W. Perra.

Dawn Of The Head.

The plot of the movie sees Lance attempt to blackmail a family of freaks known as the “Stackpool” after witnessing them kidnap someone late at night. The family is run by “Myron” who is little more than a head. Myron’s over-sized brain is able to psychically control the other members of his family, who all are intellectual simpletons. Otis is the family’s muscle, inhumanly strong. Wheeler is the families eyes and ears, with superhuman perception and Ernestina… well I don’t have to tell you what she can do.

Lance has the family knock off the local crime boss so that he can steal his lady, the beautiful Loretta with whom he has been having an affair. After this is done though, Lance presses the rich family for more and causes Myron to take drastic action. This leads to a bizarre performance of Joan of Arc with a potentially fatal finale for Loretta.

Head And Butter.

The plot is simple, but has enough to it to for a little world building and allows the story to progress in a logical linear fashion. While the roles are fairly undemanding, the characters are quite fun. Lance and Loretta especially work well. Despite being total dirtbags, the pair present a lot of charm and personality. It definitely doesn’t hurt to get to see so much (Literally) of the lovely Mrs Lovell either. Most of the Stackpool family are one dimension by design, though their unique talents does makes them memorable. J.W. Perra did a particularly good job as Myron. I’m not sure if playing a head in a wheelchair is a hard role or an easy one, but he did a great job either way.

The effects are mostly in the bizarre look of the family (Myron in specific though Wheeler’s freaky eyes too) and they do their job fine. I have to give a mention to Richard Band’s soundtrack here as being particularly good and well suited to what was on screen. Richard is of course Charlies’ brother, so it’s no surprise to find he’s written over 100 movie scores, most of which for his brother’s productions. This one is a stand out though, with a quirky almost Addams Family vibe to it.

Conclusion (Sorry, No Pun Heading This Time).

Overall this is a fun movie and in my opinion exactly what a low budget B-Movie Black Comedy Horror should be. A crazy idea, straight forward plot and fun characters. A movie executed with minimal fuss and presented with just enough polish to have it stand out above all the other low budget B-Movies. While it is still a B-Movie, it is one worthy to be a cult classic.

For me this a 6/10, though your mileage may vary depending on how much you like these kind of films. If you were a fan of Charles Band produced Horror/Comedies such as Terrorvision, Re-Animator and Evil Bong, you’ll probably get a kick out of this. If not, I imagine this will probably make your head hurt!

Rating: 6 out of 10.

Totally Killer (2023)

Posted on by fenrisfil

Tonight’s October Challenge Review is the Horror Comedy “Totally Killer” from Amazon MGM Studios and Blumhouse, released direct to streaming on Amazon this year. This is from Nahnatchka Khan, a comedy writer/producer/director in her first foray into Horror and her second feature movie as director. Written by the team of David Matalon, Sasha Perl-Raver and Jen D’Angelo, the latter of which being the most experienced. This is a team clearly coming from TV comedy backgrounds, but sometimes people can surprise you so let’s see if this movie does.

Back to the Screaming.

The movie stars Kiernan Shipka (Who played Sabrina Spellman in the darker 2018 Sabrina reboot series) as Jamie Hughes. The main support comes from Olivia Holt (Dagger from the Cloak and Dagger series) as the younger version of Jamie’s mother “Olivia”. The movie obviously takes influence from “Back to the Future”, “Scream”, “Heathers” and 80’s nostalgia in general, but also seems very similar to the 2015 movie “Final Girls”, though it’s unclear if that is intentional. In regards to the other influence though these are all referenced directly or indirectly in the movie.

The starts at the 35th anniversary of a spree of murders by a killer called “The Sweet Sixteen Killer”. A killer that was never caught (Disappearing after the original three murders) and who was famous for wearing a BIlly Idol/Max Headroom mask and stabbing his victims 16 times. After Jamie’s mother is murdered the town assumes the same killer has returned. After being chased by the killer into an amusement park Jamie takes refuge in her friends experimental time machine and ends up going back in time to the 1980’s where she attempts to prevent the murders and stop the killer, with the primary goal of saving her mother.

Culture Clash.

This is a fish out of water film, where Jamie faces constant culture shock at the differences between the 80’s and the modern day. The lack of caution and security when doing things, people being politically incorrect and even the weaker marijuana. This is the source of most of the comedy and for the most part it lands quite well. Along with this Jamie having to deal with the fact her parents weren’t always the mature responsible over protective types they are now. Indeed her first interaction with her mother is getting a dodge ball to the face from her.

This all works pretty well, though is perhaps a little overplayed in places. The only exception really is her friend who put together the time machine and her mother who are pretty much duplicates of each other (And it is her friends mother that helps her out in the past). That makes the pair the least interesting characters who are basically there just to facilitate the time travel. The rest of the characters though are a colorful goofy bunch that fits the tone of the film well.

90’s Slasher In An 80’s Setting

In regards to the horror/mystery aspect, it was pretty easy to figure out who the killer was. Not from the plot itself as they don’t reveal the key fact that would have made it obvious until after the killer is revealed, but instead by the way the character is presented in the story. It only really made sense they were introduced for the purpose of ending up as the killer, though I do have to praise how they tried to use elements specific to the mask to throw people off the scent, but it didn’t work. It’d be spoilers to say much more about the murders so I’ll leave that one there, but suffice to say there are no shocks in the reveal.

This is base level, Scream knock off stuff (On the level of most 90’s slashers). it’s clear though that this isn’t the focus of the story, even though it’s the driving element of the plot. There was nothing particular of note in any of the kills and there wasn’t a great deal in the way of stalking or anything along the way. The killer isn’t really scary and even when we are first introduced to them they mostly get their ass kicked by their victim (Which is especially reminiscent of the Scream series).

Then and Now and Then Again.

The movie’s approach to time travel is one of convenience. It still has the characters in the original timeline get a linear run of updates to their timeline that happens to match events happening in the film. This is obviously done to cover up the events yet to happen in the film, but it doesn’t really make that much sense. The irony here is the film takes a shot at Back to the Future’s take on time travel and then lays down it’s own rules that don’t make much more sense.

We are told that should her parents not get together that she will persist as a character out of time and yet that is merely one theory on time travel. Yet, the entire existence of the “Grandfather Paradox” is evidence this is a debate and not fact. Indeed the main theory of persistence is based on multiple timelines and if this movie was doing that the characters at her exit point wouldn’t notice any changes and as soon as some were made they would have been isolated from their friend. The truth is the convenience of Marty’s photograph wasn’t any less unscientific than the minute by minute updating of the past/future in this film.

Conclusion

Overall this is a fun but flawed movie. It’s strength is it’s comedy and not for the horror or science fiction aspects. You can tell this is from a team of comedy writers simply using horror as their theme. It’s also very hard not to compare this movie to “Final Girls” as despite that involving characters getting sucked into a movie instead of using time travel, they share a very similar plots. Ultimately though Final Girls is the superior movie and a good part of that is it seemed to understand the genre better. As a Horror this would be a high 5/10, as a comedy it would be a solid 6/10 so I’ll balance that out with a high 5.5/10. If you have Amazon Prime then it won’t cost you anything to view and you’ll probably get a laugh out of it.

Rating: 5.5 out of 10.

Munster, Go Home! (1966)

Posted on by fenrisfil

For a bit of a change from my usual Horror viewing this October I’m checking out a Horror adjacent comedy in the 1966 movie “Munster, Go Home!” As the name suggests this is the original Munsters movie and It’s going to be hard not run comparisons here with the Rob Zombie movie “The Munsters” from 2022. Like Zombie’s disastrous attempt at a reboot, this is also in colour but unlike that film this features the vast majority of the original TV cast. The only exception is for the character “Marilyn” who is played here by Debbie Watson. Most importantly Fred Gwynne reprises his role as Herman, The movie is directed by Earl Bellamy, who also directed several episodes of the TV show.

The movie was produced after the series ended, partially to help introduce foreign audiences to the series which had just entered syndication. It was the first of three movies produced with the original cast. There have been three additional movies featuring a new cast since (All basically reboots) and a TV series in the 80’s. Of that lot, I’ve only seen the Rob Zombie film and of course the original series. Growing up in England in the 1980’s the original show was constantly being rerun on TV (I don’t think we ever got the reboot series). At some point I will check out the two remaining original cast films.

Lord Munster

This story begins with the Munsters’ learning that Herman has inherited an estate and title of “Lord Munster” of a relative in England. This sets the family to travel to England (Via boat, which is effectively the films first act). The surviving English Munsters’ are basically an inversion of the American family, normal(ish) on the outside and deeply monsterous inside. Naturally this makes for a good contrast in the story as the local community basically learn not to judge a book by it’s cover. However, the main story is the English families attempts to git rid of the American Munsters and hide their dark secrets from them.

The story naturally involves a lot of zany stuff, culminating in a final act motor race where Herman drives DRAG-U-LA (A coffin based racing car originally featured in the series but given a new origin in the movie). Grandpa spends a lot of the time getting into trouble as a wolf and Marilyn finds love with the son of the English Munsters’ local rivals. We are also treated to an appearance by eccentric English comedian Terry-Thomas who gets to thoroughly overact as the childish psychopath Freddie Munster.

Wacky Racing

This is actually a pretty solid family comedy. The charm of the TV series remains despite the new setting and change to colour. The quirkiness comes across naturally from a group of actors that are more than comfortable in their roles at this point. There’s no gimmicky visuals like in the Rob Zombie film, just a straight forward comedy movie. It is very much a 60’s comedy and that dates it a little, but doesn’t make it any less enjoyable. Terry-Thomas is a good fit with the Munsters and while he’s not the mastermind of the operation, he is definitely the centerpiece of the movies villains.

The first two acts drag a little bit, but the final act makes up for this. DRAG-U-LA just looks great in colour. The villainous and mysterious “Griffin” (The identity of which is revealed at the end, but honestly isn’t important) tries every dirty trick in the book to knock off poor Herman (Who continues to be oblivious to this), while Lilly and Grandpa have to escape from Freddie Munster and try and reach Herman to warn him. Grandpa ending up in wolf form and chased by fox hunters (Not quite sure how someone can mistake a wolf for a fox, but nevermind).

Conclusion

Overall this is a charming family comedy that stays true to the characters and show, utilizing it’s best aspects while adding in just enough to make it feel unique. It is dated (It’s extremely 60’s) and not the funniest comedy of the era, but the Munsters’ charm is timeless and from this cast it always seems to manifest effortlessly. I’m going to give this a 6/10. Your millage may vary though. If you are a fan of the show and never watched the movies, it is worth checking out. If we weren’t a fan of the show and don’t like 60’s quirky comedies, this is almost certainly not for you.

Rating: 6 out of 10.